Template:Did you know nominations/Umm al-Amad, Lebanon

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Umm al-Amad, Lebanon

The ruins in the 1840s, published in The Holy Land, Syria, Idumea, Arabia, Egypt, and Nubia
The ruins in the 1840s, published in The Holy Land, Syria, Idumea, Arabia, Egypt, and Nubia
  • ... that Ernest Renan abandoned his excavations of Umm al-Amad when he found the ruins (pictured) were only two thousand years old? Source: "Vella, 2000, p.31: "Ernest Renan was there in 1861 but abandoned the excavations he undertook when he noted that the site was of Hellenistic date."

Created by Onceinawhile (talk). Self-nominated at 21:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC).

Interesting site, on good sources, offline sources accepted AGF. The image is licensed but awfully pale, - I think the older one would have more chances to be taken. I like the hook! - A few things in the article (not needed for approval, only the qpq is needed): The word "site" appears a bit too often in close succession. The lead should be a summary of things referenced below, and then needs no references. There are way too many images in the gallery, please select the most relevant. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:19, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi @Gerda Arendt: thank you for your review. I am glad you like the hook - I was pleased with it! I have completed the QPQ, upgraded the image to a better version, and reduced the overusage of the word "site". Onceinawhile (talk) 17:33, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:02, 18 April 2020 (UTC)