Template:Did you know nominations/Trump Revealed

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:11, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Trump Revealed edit

Created by Sagecandor (talk). Self-nominated at 04:18, 23 June 2017 (UTC).

  • Comprehensive, well-written and sourced article, long enough and new enough for DYK. Copyvio detector returns high percentages, but manual examination of the results indicate this is a result of quotations that are properly quoted and cited. Primary hook cited to three sources. Alternate hook doesn't seem compelling enough for DYK so I would stick with the primary hook. Gamaliel (talk) 15:51, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
  • I've struck ALT1 because it makes no sense. (a) A book is not a process, and (b) if it's "by" X and Y, then how is it collaboratively written by 30 people? The article seems to be saying that the research was collaborative, or something. EEng 19:07, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
    • Fixed it with minor tweak. First hook is still preferable over the ALT, please. Sagecandor (talk) 19:36, 7 July 2017 (UTC)