Template:Did you know nominations/They Spent Their Wild Youthful Days in the Glittering World of the Salons

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by HalfGig talk 01:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

They Spent Their Wild Youthful Days in the Glittering World of the Salons edit

(

)

... that producer Rich Costey recorded an album called They Spent Their Wild Youthful Days in the Glittering World of the Salons and then another whose title was 90 words long?
- ALT1:... that after producing the album They Spent Their Wild Youthful Days in the Glittering World of the Salons, Rich Costey went on to record another whose title was 90 words long?

Reviewed: The Right Number

Created by Morganfitzp (talk). Self-nominated at 14:40, 31 December 2016 (UTC).

Note: Struck "Pending" above. Per QPQ Check results, the nominator appears to be exempt from performing a QPQ review. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:29, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Not sure why I'm exempt, North America¹⁰⁰⁰. Still happy to do my part in reviewing another DYK. Give me a moment to find one... Morganfitzp (talk) 23:43, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Ah, now I see why I'm exempt. Reviewed another DYK nonetheless. Morganfitzp (talk) 23:53, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

I can't find the hook facts in the article, which doesn't seem to mention the ninety word title so we need a different hook. How about a hook mentioning that one song features sounds made by a cat? You also need a citation in the "Promotion" section. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:47, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

@Morganfitzp: Some action is needed here. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:24, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

@Cwmhiraeth: Action taken with the addition of the addition of this section. I'm reticent to accept any mention of cats within the hook after the toxoplasmostic fiasco that happened with Marion Coutts' DYK. Morganfitzp (talk) 04:34, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

@Morganfitzp: I am afraid we are not there yet. You have added the ninety word title, but the reference you give seems to be wrong and does not mention Costey. There is a suitable reference I think at #4 on the Rich Costey page, but that site objects to the fact that I use Adblocker and won't show itself to me. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:30, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

@Cwmhiraeth: Funny, site had no objection to my Adblocker. Anyway, added a ref to Costey's production credits. Morganfitzp (talk) 04:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are sourced inline, the article is neutral, Earwig finds no problem with it and nor do I. Either hook could be used. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)