Template:Did you know nominations/The Danish Girl (film)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:39, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Promoted to Prep 6 by Victuallers.[1]
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
The Danish Girl (film) edit
- ... that the film The Danish Girl is based on the fiction about the life of first identifiable transgender woman Lili Elbe?
- ALT1:... that the production has begun on The Danish Girl, a fictionalized account of the life of Lili Elbe?
- QPQ: Barnes Run
5x expanded by Captain Assassin! (talk). Self nominated at 04:03, 28 February 2015 (UTC).
- How about this as an alt:
- ALT2: ... that the upcoming film The Danish Girl stars Eddie Redmayne as Lili Elbe, a transgender woman?
- IMO this is much more interesting and click-worthy – not only does it mention the name of a recent Oscar winner, but also that he is playing a woman. 97198 (talk) 05:43, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah it's good too, otherwise we can rephrase first hook as ... that the upcoming film The Danish Girl is a fictionalized account of the life of a transgender woman Lili Elbe {played by Eddie Redmayne)? --Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 04:24, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- There is a first look image of Eddie Redmayne as Lili Elbe. Can we upload it to Wikipedia and use it in the article and DYK nom? --Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 04:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
- I gather this one is still waiting for a full review? Article was expanded more than 5x in February, is long enough, is neutral, and has inline citations. (FYI, for the Variety article, the link was broken, and the Wayback Machine's version also said "Article not found". I googled and found the article at a different URL, but was unable to archive it.) (Note: I notice that Nicole Kidman is mentioned in several sources but not in the article; I wouldn't think anything of it, except that the article specifically mentions other actors who were originally cast but then left.) I ran the Dup detector on a few articles and didn't find any copyright violations. The hook (ALT2) is interesting and is supported by the Wrap article (which is not actually cited until the end). I don't see a QPQ review listed - did you do one? If this one can be ready in time, it would be a good one for Women's History Month. --Rosekelleher (talk) 17:03, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
- Rosekelleher QPQ is given now. --Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 05:02, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- I gather this one is still waiting for a full review? Article was expanded more than 5x in February, is long enough, is neutral, and has inline citations. (FYI, for the Variety article, the link was broken, and the Wayback Machine's version also said "Article not found". I googled and found the article at a different URL, but was unable to archive it.) (Note: I notice that Nicole Kidman is mentioned in several sources but not in the article; I wouldn't think anything of it, except that the article specifically mentions other actors who were originally cast but then left.) I ran the Dup detector on a few articles and didn't find any copyright violations. The hook (ALT2) is interesting and is supported by the Wrap article (which is not actually cited until the end). I don't see a QPQ review listed - did you do one? If this one can be ready in time, it would be a good one for Women's History Month. --Rosekelleher (talk) 17:03, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Okay, @Captain Assassin!:, looks good. --Rosekelleher (talk) 12:24, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
