Template:Did you know nominations/Tapeats Creek

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:07, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Tapeats Creek

edit
Overhead view of Tapeats Creek

Created by MB (talk). Self-nominated at 01:37, 3 May 2017 (UTC).

  • The article is new and was nominated timely but on the wrong date. This doesn't affect the eligibility. Minor renovation of the hook to make it shorter and neutral. The prose passes the 1,500+ mark. The citation is good. No major policy issues. The article mostly lists facts. Has done the QPQ. The image is... interesting but unsure how to deal with it. Someone else needs to check the image. This reviewer can't. Still checking the references for issues but on the surface there seem ain't one. Maybe the hook can be improved? To something more interesting.
  • This is likely to pass but still have to check. There isn't any glaring issues that can disqualify it but it can still be improved. It kinda reads as bland but it still follows the rules to pass. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 12:26, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Shhhhwwww!!, not sure why you think it was "nominated on the wrong date". The article was created on 4/30 and correctly posted on that date in the nominations section. On ALT1, I think "claimed the stream" might be too vague to be understood by a broad audience, that is why I said "claimed ownership". The promoter can decide on that. MB 14:02, 15 May 2017 (UTC)