Template:Did you know nominations/Supermarine Stranraer

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 00:31, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Supermarine Stranraer

Picture of the Supermarine Stranraer
Picture of the Supermarine Stranraer
  • ... that the Supermarine Stranraer (pictured) was already considered obsolete when it entered military service? Source: Pegram, Ralph (2016). Beyond the Spitfire: The Unseen Designs of R.J. Mitchell. Cheltenham, UK: The History Press. ISBN 978-0-7509-6515-6. Page 137

Improved to Good Article status by Amitchell125 (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 19:30, 3 November 2022 (UTC).

  • Article was promoted to GA status on time. No close paraphrasing was detected. A QPQ has been done. ALT0 is cited inline, AGF on the offline source. ALT1 is cited inline, but the actual sentence that mentions the "whistling shithouse" sentence is lacking a footnote; the footnote referencing it needs to be duplicated for DYK purposes. There's also a missing space before "In QCA use". Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 07:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
I have to note that ALT1 is my preferred hook, but if it doesn't work out or if consensus says that it can't run then ALT0 is a good alternative. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:18, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
@Narutolovehinata5: Issues have been resolved. Onegreatjoke (talk) 15:01, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you, GTG. My preferred hook remains ALT1; however, if consensus states that it can't run due to the use of the word "shit", then ALT0 can be used as an alternative. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:02, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
@Narutolovehinata5 and Onegreatjoke: could you verify the image's licensing status for me, please? theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/her) 10:21, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
I have no idea how reliable this source is, but it says that the plane only served with the RCAF until 1946 and it claims that the pic was taken by them, so while I couldn't find an actual year or location, according to it the pic would have been taken no later than 1946, which is over 50 years ago. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 17:46, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Seems to be ripping from a newspaper, so I'll take it. thanks! theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/her) 00:12, 14 November 2022 (UTC)