Template:Did you know nominations/Stukas (film)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:53, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Withdrawn

Stukas (film) edit

  • Comment: Created on 24 October, moved to mainspace on 29 October; nominating under the former date for simplicity's sake.

Created/expanded by Yngvadottir (talk). Self nom at 21:49, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

  • And I have now reviewed Colt Lyerla. Yngvadottir (talk) 21:05, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Article is long enough and was moved into mainspace on 29th October. The hook is suitably sourced. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:20, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! However:
I'm placing this nomination on hold for now pending repudiation of the RfC closure in favor of having DYK be required to include GAs. I do not participate in GA and therefore will not participate in a blended DYK project. Yngvadottir (talk) 22:16, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
I'm not aware of any movement since the AN thread on revisiting the closure was archived without action, so DYK remains at an impasse, at least from my point of view. I regret this extremely; I valued DYK very highly and was happy to help out there (and I was looking forward to sharing the Wagner cure for shellshock) but I can't help incubate a cuckoo's egg. So I guess unless there's something I'm unaware of, this had better be withdrawn. --Yngvadottir (talk) 13:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)