Template:Did you know nominations/St Mary's Anglican Church, Busselton

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 19:19, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

St Mary's Anglican Church, Busselton

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

St Mary's Church in 2015

• ... that St Mary's Anglican Church, Busselton, Australia (pictured), which was consecrated in 1848, has been a part of six dioceses, namely Canterbury, Calcutta, Sydney, Adelaide, Perth and Bunbury? Source: REGISTER OF HERITAGE PLACES ASSESSMENT DOCUMENTATION (page 4): "... it was consecrated by Bishop Short on 2 November 1848 ..."; (page 6): "The porch ... has four small stained glass windows that depict the dioceses to which the church has belonged; Canterbury, Calcutta, Sydney, Adelaide, Perth and Bunbury."
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/John Hoke III

Created by Bahnfrend (talk). Self-nominated at 15:12, 31 December 2022 (UTC).

• Article is new, long enough and neutral. (Note: The nomination date of 25 December is incorrect. It reached eligibility on 30 December.) It cites sources inline. "Earwig's Copyvio Detector " reports no significant text similarities, commenting "copyvio unlikely". The hook is well-formatted and interesting. Its length is within limit, and its fact is accurate with inline citation. Image is ©-free. QPQ is missing. Approval will be after the QPQ is done. CeeGee 09:30, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the review. I will do a QPQ in the next few days. Bahnfrend (talk) 13:10, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
    • @CeeGee: QPQ now done. Bahnfrend (talk) 05:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
• Everything is fine now. Good to go. CeeGee 10:16, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

@CeeGee and Bahnfrend: Just noting that 30 citations are referenced to one Heritage council document. I will be promoting, but my own opinion is that 30 citations referenced to one document is not ideal. Bruxton (talk) 19:18, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

@Bruxton and CeeGee: That's a fair comment. However, the Heritage Council document is itself referenced by footnotes to many other sources, at least half of which are offline secondary sources. I could add some or all of those other sources to the references to the article, but that would make the references section a great deal longer without adding any real value to the article as a whole, because the Heritage Council document, including all of its footnotes, is linked directly to the article. Bahnfrend (talk) 07:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

• @Bruxton: Noted your advice. @Bahnfrend: Thank you for the clarification. CeeGee 16:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

• Alt0a ... that St Mary's Anglican Church, Busselton, Australia (pictured), which was consecrated in 1848, has belonged to six dioceses, namely Canterbury, Calcutta, Sydney, Adelaide, Perth and Bunbury? Suggested by TSventon in the article's talk page. CeeGee 09:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

• Article was copyedited inline with the discusson and the above mentioned ALT-hook. I approve the ALT-hook. Good to go. CeeGee 09:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)