Template:Did you know nominations/Southern spotted skunk

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:04, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Southern spotted skunk edit

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self nominated at 06:20, 21 September 2014 (UTC).

  • Comment (not review): You might want to come up with a better hook. IMO That won't attract peoples attention. -- NickGibson3900 Talk 07:03, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Agreed, but I didn't see anything more "attractive" in the article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:26, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Recent enough expansion. Barely long enough, measuring 1580 characters at my count, but technically it's enough. Well sourced with inline citations, neutral, no indication of copyvio or close paraphrasing. Hook isn't great, but it works (there've been worse). QPQ done. Good to go. G S Palmer (talkcontribs) 16:01, 21 September 2014 (UTC)