Template:Did you know nominations/Serbian parliamentary election, 2012
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 12:28, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Serbian parliamentary election, 2012 edit
- ... that by early polls, opposition Serbian Progressive Party have higher ratings than the next three most popular parties combined in the upcoming elections in Serbia?
- Reviewed: Ming Sen Shiue
Created/expanded by LAz17 (talk), WhiteWriter (talk), Patrickneil (talk). Nominated by WhiteWriter (talk) at 21:31, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
- Length seems OK, it's new, and the facts in the tag are referenced. I think it's
OK.
- Ref 1 could use tidying-up. Also, I'd like to see the table improved;
- Instead of a column entited 'link', I suggest putting the link as an inline citation, probably following the "Source"; some headings are centre-aligned but the content is left-aligned; and having a "Margin of Error" as 'n/a' seems odd; all polls have errors - so maybe 'unknown' is better than "n/a".
- It could use a copy-edit. Example, thought they may be held earlier should be though they may be held earlier.
- I'm not sure why The 2008 election resulted in a new "pro-European" government uses those scare quotes. Also, that paragraph has no reference at the end of it.
- In Fall 2011, posters and billboards endorsing various parties peppered Belgrade. could use a reference.
Chzz ► 19:41, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- All
Done and 
Fixed. Thank you for your fine review! --WhiteWriter speaks 21:22, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
- All
