Template:Did you know nominations/Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Bureau of Reclamation
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 08:57, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Bureau of Reclamation edit
- ... that a fish and a bird sued two United States Federal agencies in Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Bureau of Reclamation?
- Reviewed: Human rights in Guinea
Created/expanded by Aymatth2 (talk). Self nom at 20:57, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hook: Interesting, short enough, cited. No image to check.
- Article: New enough, long enough, well cited. No close paraphrasing found. Several ref errors though (SFN errors with Bauer and Benevidez)
- Summary:
Fix references. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:32, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- I have fixed the SFN errors. My mistake for being sloppy when copying background info from Isleta Diversion Dam and San Acacia Diversion Dam (I started those too, so there is no internal copying concern). Aymatth2 (talk) 14:58, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Looks good now. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:06, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- I have fixed the SFN errors. My mistake for being sloppy when copying background info from Isleta Diversion Dam and San Acacia Diversion Dam (I started those too, so there is no internal copying concern). Aymatth2 (talk) 14:58, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
