Template:Did you know nominations/Repatriation tax avoidance

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 07:20, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Repatriation tax avoidance

Improved to Good Article status by Mhawk10 (talk). Self-nominated at 18:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC).

  • Article has achieved Good Article status. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. Hook is interesting and sourced. QPQ is done. Looks ready to go! Thriley (talk) 15:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
  • @Mhawk10 and Thriley: I was going to promote this, but I had problems verifying this hook. While the article mentions that Merck & Co. avoided paying the repatriation taxes, the $3 billion amount is not mentioned in the article. Can this be added to the article, or an alternate hook suggested? Thanks. Z1720 (talk) 18:14, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
    • @Z1720 and Thriley: See page 12 of the first source I provided above to verify the hook. It's under section 2.3, which notes that Merck avoided repatriation tax of about $3 billion associated with its 2009 stock-acquisition of U.S.-based pharmaceutical company, Schering-Plough, by implementing a variation of this maneuver, the maneuver being an Outbound F tax avoidance scheme. I've added the number to the article.
  • I can confirm that this fact is in the source and the article. Re-adding tick so that promoters know that this is ready. Z1720 (talk) 19:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
To T:DYK/P1