The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Alex ShihTalk 17:48, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Rajiin edit

5x expanded by Miyagawa (talk). Self nominated at 19:37, 3 August 2013 (UTC).

Rather than just saying "one reviewer", why not mention Michelle Erica Green or TrekNation by name? More to the point, can you (or, indeed, anyone) confirm that TrekNation is a reliable source? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:35, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

  • TrekNation is one of only four fan websites linked to from the Official Star Trek website, and the source has been used in numerous Good Articles. The ST project has worked up a list of reliable sources here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Star Trek/Sources. Miyagawa (talk) 20:45, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
    Alt1:... Michelle Erica Green, in her review for TrekNation, complained about the gratuitous female sexuality seen in the Star Trek: Enterprise episode "Rajiin"? Miyagawa (talk) 20:45, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
    Okay, I'm still a bit twitchy about TrekNation, but it's been referenced in several news sources, and I'd expect the WikiProject to know more about its reliability than me just walking in off the (metaphorical) street, so I'm happy to accept the alternative hook. Everything else checks out okay, so in my view, this is good for the front page. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:21, 6 August 2013 (UTC)