Template:Did you know nominations/Psilocybe cyanescens

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:42, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Psilocybe cyanescens edit

Psilocybe cyanescens mushrooms.

  • Reviewed: Review requirement doesn't apply to me; I have no previous DYK's.
  • Comment: DYKCheck.js isn't saying it passes right now - I think this is because there was a previous edit years ago that added in a lot (3.2k words worth) of non-sourced non-wikified content that was totally deleted. The article is at slightly more than 5x expansion of (the character count of) prose content since August 27th, though - presumably, an old set of bad edits won't count against it. I'm not done editing it yet - the prose could be prettier and the sections should probably be rearranged a bit - but wanted to make sure I got this nom up before the dyk window was done.

Created/expanded by Kgorman-ucb (talk). Self nom at 00:14, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

  • 5x expansion and date check out. Hook is supported by source and is interesting. I added the PD picture, bolded/italicized article link, linked racetrack to horse racing and added word "approximately" to better reflect source. No copyvio in the sources I could locate online. Close paraphrasing is minimal with a few phrases like "racetrack in the south of England" close to source. Froggerlaura (talk) 01:47, 1 September 2011 (UTC)