- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 07:41, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Pachypanthera
- ... that the early big cat Pachypanthera may have eaten bones like a hyena? Source: de Bonis, L.; Chaimanee, Y.; Grohé, C.; Chavasseau, O.; Mazurier, A.; Suraprasit, K.; Jaeger, J. J. (2023). "A new large pantherine and a sabre-toothed cat (Mammalia, Carnivora, Felidae) from the late Miocene hominoid-bearing Khorat sand pits, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, northeastern Thailand". The Science of Nature. 110 (5). 42.
- ALT1: ... that the early big cat Pachypanthera may have weighed as much as 142 kilograms (313 lb) and had teeth similar to a hyena's?
- ALT2: ... that the early big cat Pachypanthera may have weighed as much as 142 kilograms (313 lb) and eaten bones?
- Reviewed: [[]]
- Comment: Both 4444hhhh and I have nominated less than 5 DYKs before, so quid pro quo is not required.
Created by SilverTiger12 (talk) and 4444hhhh (talk). Nominated by SilverTiger12 (talk) at 14:17, 27 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Pachypanthera; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall:
Article is dependent on a single paper from a very reliable source. Should be fine, but if a popular science source picks it up, or another paper is published, would be worth adding in as a second reference for readers to follow ASAP. —
siroχo 05:13, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Article is dependent on a single paper from a very reliable source. Should be fine, but if a popular science source picks it up, or another paper is published, would be worth adding in as a second reference for readers to follow ASAP. —siroχo 05:13, 30 September 2023 (UTC)