Template:Did you know nominations/Open–closed political spectrum
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by 97198 (talk) 12:40, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate nomination
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Open–closed political spectrum edit
- ... that "open" vs. closed" is a new binary classification of politics to replace or supplement the left vs. right divide?
- ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
Created by Smurrayinchester (talk). Nominated by Staszek Lem (talk) at 02:01, 10 May 2017 (UTC).
- I cannot help but comment that this is the first really universally useful new article I've seen in a long time. Staszek Lem (talk) 02:07, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Staszek Lem: Ha, thank you very much! This has actually already been nominated and accepted - see Template:Did you know nominations/Open–closed politics. Smurrayinchester 07:38, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate nomination. Smurrayinchester 07:38, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Smurrayinchester: That's because you didnt follow the procedure to the point: you didnt tag the new article talk page. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:54, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
