Template:Did you know nominations/New Jersey State Guard

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Zanhe (talk) 03:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

New Jersey State Guard edit

(

)

... that Alfred E. Driscoll defied federal policy and ordered racial integration of the New Jersey State Guard in 1948, making it "the first component of the entire U.S. Armed Forces to end segregation"?

ALT1:... that the New Jersey State Guard was racially integrated in 1948, making it "the first component of the entire U.S. Armed Forces to end segregation"?
Reviewed: Magdala stone

Created by Et0048 (talk). Nominated by Alansohn (talk) at 21:10, 24 December 2015 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - ?

Hook eligibility:

Cited: - n
Interesting:
Other problems: - n

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Checked for core criteria as noted above. Article does not contain the information noted in either hook. There is no mention of Driscoll's defiance, or of the NJ Guard being the first to integrate. When I made random Google checks for paraphrasing, I did uncover one example: (quote marks not in nom or article) "primarily with the protection of vital installations, such as bridges, reservoirs". Either paraphrasing or quote marks are called for as a correction.Georgejdorner (talk) 00:03, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Stale. Nominator was issued about problems on their talk page five days ago and has since been active. Jolly Ω Janner 06:03, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

My WP access and time has been limited over the past few weeks and I hadn't seen the issues here. I will resolve the concerns in the next few days or agree to drop this nomination. Alansohn (talk) 16:10, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Over a week since the nominators appeal for more time. While both the nominator and article author have both been active during parts of the week, no edits have been made to the article to address the outstanding issues. --Allen3 ^talk 00:39, 2 February 2016 (UTC)