- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:05, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
National Industrial Security Academy
Moved to mainspace by Deepak G Goswami (talk). Self-nominated at 03:59, 20 August 2019 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Will be accepted although nominated with a few hours delay after 7 days nominated on time, needs copy edit See earwig. Wikilink Centre of excellence, Industrial security, Disaster management, and other possible internal links. DBigXrayᗙ 11:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you DBigXray for your review but the thing you mentioned about few hours delay, I nominated it within few hours of moving it to mainspace from my user space. I am very new to Wikipedia so can you please tell me if this or any of my article that I work on in my sandbox would not be considered "new" if I move it to mainspace after a week? Also, can you be generous enough to do the needful copy editing?-Deepak G Goswami (talk) 06:52, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Oops, my bad, I failed to notice the page move edit. I have struck off my comment. The article once moved to the mainspace is considered to be created. Yes, your article developed in sandbox would be considered new. You are free to use draft space or userspace to develop the article. IMHO, Draft space is better than userspace because, other editors could also help in improving the article there. Draftspace abandoned without any edit for six months may be deleted. Normally other editors dont edit another editor's sandbox. Regarding your request for copy edit, I can do it myself but I would insist that you read wP:CLOP and then give copy editing a try as a part of the learning experience. ping me here once you are done. I will review and do the final touches if at all they are needed. regards. DBigXrayᗙ 07:07, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Though I have read the said WP:CLOP, as you asked me to, but I don't understand where in the article there is any hint of paraphrasing. I have written the whole article in my own words and if you suggest having "National Symposium on Excellence in Training organised by the Department of Personnel and Training" as it's written in the source amounts to paraphrasing then I disagree with this Wikipedia guideline/policy (if there's any such) as only word that matches is "organised" and rest cannot and should not be tried to rewrite in any other words. I might be hitting the wrong note here so enlighten me if I sound clueless. Thanks and regards. -Deepak G Goswami (talk) 09:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- The bot is picking this up due to multiple words being used in the same sequence. A rephrasing can help the situation. Please fix the WP:ORPHAN issue by using find link tool. DBigXrayᗙ 10:27, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Fixed the orphan situation. These tools are really handy can you please tell me where I can get to know more about such tools? -Deepak G Goswami (talk) 14:36, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
all issues resolved. D G, I will reply on your talk about tools. DBigXrayᗙ 17:39, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
