- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Schwede66 03:34, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Nad's edit
( )
- ... that honey, molasses, sugar and lemon juice were the ingredients used to develop Nad's hair removal gel?
Created/expanded by Till I Go Home (talk). Self nom at 07:13, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
My instincts are that this is barely notable. Three bits of soft media coverage - are these reliable sources? Secretlondon (talk) 03:54, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- Barely notable? It is Australia's best selling personal care product! The Daily Telegraph and The Guardian are absolutely reliable sources. I'm not sure about the second, but that's only to source the produtcs they create. I will try to look for more sources. Till I Go Home (talk) 08:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- The lead of the article is not a proper lead (i.e. it does not summarise the article, but contains material that is not mentioned in the body). As such, it is necessary to add a reference to the lead section. Schwede66 19:32, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed. Till I Go Home talk edits 00:58, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- The lead of the article is not a proper lead (i.e. it does not summarise the article, but contains material that is not mentioned in the body). As such, it is necessary to add a reference to the lead section. Schwede66 19:32, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- Barely notable? It is Australia's best selling personal care product! The Daily Telegraph and The Guardian are absolutely reliable sources. I'm not sure about the second, but that's only to source the produtcs they create. I will try to look for more sources. Till I Go Home (talk) 08:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- I for one don't have an issue with notability. If others have, they should test this at AfD. Long enough, new enough. But I'm concerned that the main section 'Background and history' is close in structure to the article 'How a fight changed Sue', and paraphrasing ought to improve, as a check with Duplication Detector shows. Can you please improve on that? Schwede66 05:25, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- I will work on it. Thanks. Till I Go Home talk edits 07:00, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
