Template:Did you know nominations/Mark Romanek videography

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:18, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Mark Romanek videography edit

5x expanded by Damian Vo (talk). Self-nominated at 14:02, 26 September 2017 (UTC).

  • Article: IMHO, this is a new article, being a redirect converted into something with content. (Or it's 90 bytes turned into >42K bytes. Take your pick) It is clearly long enough, & appears to cite all sources at every appropriate point.
  • Hook: the first is the more catchy of the two. Wish the budget amounts could be fit into the 200 character limit, though: that would grab more readers. But we have to make do with what we have.
  • Has the nominator fulled the quid pro quo requirement? I don't see where that is indicated. If so, then it can be queued to appear.

-- llywrch (talk) 20:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Since I have less than 5 DYK credits, I think it's not needed. Damian Vo (talk) 12:00, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
That works. Just be sure to include that detail until you have more than that. -- llywrch (talk) 06:17, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you so so much. Damian Vo (talk) 06:31, 1 October 2017 (UTC)