- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 00:28, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Mahaganapati edit
- ... that Mahaganapati (pictured) is a depiction of the Supreme Being?
- Reviewed: Mungu ibariki Afrika
Created by Redtigerxyz (talk). Self nominated at 13:06, 19 June 2014 (UTC).
Article is new enough, long enough, well cited and apparently comprehensive. AGF on offline sources, QPQ done, image is appropriately licensed. My only quibble would be that perhaps it should be mentioned in the hook that this regards a specific sect of Hinduism, e.g. "that... of the Supreme Being in the Ganapatya sect?", otherwise it is too generic. Constantine ✍ 11:09, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
- Constantine, for hookiness the detail was dropped. Also when the hook says "a depiction" (not the depiction), it indicates that other representations exist. Redtigerxyz Talk 12:02, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
- I realise that, that's why it is a quibble, not an objection ;). I just preferred it for clarity's sake. The hook is good to go as it is. Constantine ✍ 12:05, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
