Template:Did you know nominations/Mahākāśyapa

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 11:27, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Mahākāśyapa

Wooden sculpture of Mahākāśyapa
Wooden sculpture of Mahākāśyapa
  • ... that Mahākāśyapa (pictured), a prominent disciple of the Buddha, was known for his compassion for the poor? Source: "I showcase the socially conscious begging practices of the saint Mahakassapa as seen through the eyes of redactors working in Pali and Sanskrit. This Buddhist saint shows a pattern of taking food from impoverished, unfortunate donors so as to vanquish their bad karma and help them to achieve a better rebirth." (Wilson 2003, p.57)
    • ALT1:... that Mahākāśyapa (pictured), a prominent disciple of the Buddha, has been described as representing the "rough ascetic spirit" of early Buddhism? Source: "L'esprit monastique exigeait d'autres vertus du chef de la Congrégation: une dureté qui punit les transgressions, une rude énergie d'ascète" (Analayo 2016, p. 172, note 75;Przyluski 1926, p. 297)
    • ALT2:... that according to numerous Sanskrit, Chinese and Southeast Asian texts, Mahākāśyapa (pictured) left his body in suspended animation, to see the future Buddha? Source: numerous, see article
    • ALT3:... that the account of Mahākāśyapa (pictured) receiving a flower from the Buddha and simply smiling at it, became important to the identity of Chan Buddhism?

Improved to Good Article status by Farang Rak Tham (talk) and Samahita (talk). Nominated by Farang Rak Tham (talk) at 20:51, 28 April 2020 (UTC).

  • Substantial article, meeting of GA criteria implicates DYK pass. AGF on foreign language source. I think ALT2 is the most interesting of the bunch. Ping me when you've completed the QPQ and I'll pass this nom. Morgan695 (talk) 23:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Thanks, Morgan. Great that you have taken the time to take a look at this huge article. I'll get to QPQ ASAP.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 14:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Hi, I came by to promote this, but the QPQ is not a full review, just a discussion about hook wording. Can you supply another QPQ please? Yoninah (talk) 21:48, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Yoninah, my review was complete, but the nominator and me were not able to come to an agreement, why is why I asked other editors to get involved.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 11:16, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Oh, now I see it. Sorry about my confusion. Yoninah (talk) 11:19, 14 May 2020 (UTC)