Template:Did you know nominations/Lomatium erythrocarpum

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:54, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Lomatium erythrocarpum

edit

The redfruit desertparsley (Lomatium erythrocarpum)

Created/expanded by IceCreamAntisocial (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 09:33, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

  • More or less acceptable as is, although I have a few comments:
  • Is it common practice in species articles to use metric measures first and then the customary equivalents in parentheses? Since it's about a plant found only in the US the usage would usually be opposite (the Center for Plant Convservation page from which most of the info has been taken does it that way, I noticed).
  • Thx for reviewing! Usually, on Wikipedia we just tend to stick with the units the author of the article uses :) Rcej (Robert)talk 02:30, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Uh, no. WP:UNIT says that metric is supposed to be used in science articles. So this is correct, but not for the reason you believe. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Cool! ;) Rcej (Robert)talk 05:05, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
  • There could be more than just an able recitation of the facts of the plant. The source notes it's "the only species of Lomatium in the Pacific Northwest that grows on south-facing slopes at high elevations" and also explains why the USFWS doesn't consider it to be even a threatened species despite its rarity.

    Of course, eventually, I'm sure we'll be able to use the cited journal articles as additional sources. Daniel Case (talk) 18:03, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

  • True. Rcej (Robert)talk 02:30, 18 October 2011 (UTC)