Template:Did you know nominations/Lob Gott getrost mit Singen

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:27, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Lob Gott getrost mit Singen

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 19:56, 28 February 2021 (UTC).

Gerda Arendt This is my first review, so maybe I'm a little too lax or too harsh. So bear with me:) AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 22:10, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

  • Opening of History section is not a sentence.
  • I don't know what a secular tune is;) I think many readers also won't know that. Please explain a bit.
  • New: Created on 21.
  • Char count: 1650+, although prose seems to have been stretched a bit;)
  • Copyvio, npov etc: Good.
  • QPQ: Done.
  • Hook: Interesting.
  • Hook source: OK. not OK; a book-seller website. Also, I can't see something resembling "was used for the title of a songbook aimed at senior citizens" there. It says, it is good for services at nursing homes. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 22:10, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for looking. Sorry, I nominated a bit under time pressure to not miss the deadline. The first sentence is fixed. - A hymn is a piece of church music, and the melody was originally "not for church" = secular. - this and this are from the publisher. "Diakonie" is a church agency. - No rush. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:45, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
ALT1: ... that "Lob Gott getrost mit Singen" (Praise God confidently with singing), the beginning of a 1544 hymn by the Bohemian Brethren, was used for the title of a songbook intended for services in nursing homes? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:47, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
How does the bot work? It has marked this nom as approved:/AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 22:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the alternate hook Gerda. My main concern though, that the source is the seller website, remains;)AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 22:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
You shouldn't use the icons for the final vote for individual points ;) - you could use Green tickY and Red XN instead, or just prose. - Diakonie is no seller, but charity. Bedtime, remind me tomorrow. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for the information. I didn't know this, and just copied the done sign from another review, lol :DAhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 17:57, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Well, Diakonie could be a charity and I'm not sure if sourcing quality rules are different for church-music articles, but still I do not consider it a reliable 3rd party source. I am going to pass this (with alt1), but as this is my first review, I would request the promoting editor to double-check this (as recommended by WP:DYKR). Thanks. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 17:57, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Ahmad, sorry that I had no time for it yet. (I wanted to expand an article I found interesting, for DYK, and can't even find a reference for the day of birth ...) I added the page of the publisher of the song book as another ref. - You will have to do one of the following: pick the icon for approval - the blue one as assuming good faith - and hope that the promoter will see your comment about double-checking, or the red one, requesting a new reviewer. Without an icon, this will sit forever ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:12, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Done above. Is that fine, or a new comment below this is needed? AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 18:21, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
It's fine, thank you so much. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:31, 3 March 2021 (UTC)