- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 23:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Jo Inkpin
Created by DrMushEa (talk). Self-nominated at 00:08, 14 July 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
There is an unsourced statement in the Writing section of the article concerning authorship of a website called Trans Spirit Flourishing which needs to be sourced before the nomination can proceed. Additionally, the CopyVio detector returned an extremely high hit on the following page: [2]. This is due to the bibliography present in both this article and that page. The formatting is extremely similar, and unstandardized, and should probably be reformatted with the cite book template. /Tpdwkouaa (talk) 20:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Update: I've thinned the bibliography and converted them to book citations to reduce the copyvio score, as well as removing some of the entries which appeared to be blog entries that I could not verify. /Tpdwkouaa (talk) 20:58, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Update: The unsourced statement mentioned above has been rectified. by the nominator. Everything looks good now, DrMushEa, excellent work here and thank you for your prompt fix of the source issue! /Tpdwkouaa (talk) 18:04, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
There is an unsourced statement in the Writing section of the article concerning authorship of a website called Trans Spirit Flourishing which needs to be sourced before the nomination can proceed. Additionally, the CopyVio detector returned an extremely high hit on the following page: [2]. This is due to the bibliography present in both this article and that page. The formatting is extremely similar, and unstandardized, and should probably be reformatted with the cite book template. /Tpdwkouaa (talk) 20:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)