Template:Did you know nominations/History sniffing

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 18:43, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

History sniffing

5x expanded by Sohom Datta (talk). Self-nominated at 14:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/History sniffing; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

I mistakenly nominated this under the Creation rule, however, this should have been nominated on the expanded 5x rule. Sohom (talk) 18:33, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Expanded within the window, long enough and generally a reasonable-looking article, with plenty of citations and no obvious issues with NPOV or copyvio. I think ALT1 is the better hook: however, I can't see any mention of Papa John's in the linked article. Are they perhaps mentioned in a different source? UndercoverClassicist T·C 08:27, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
@undercoverClassicist I've swapped the source for the actual complaint document from FTC which does mention Papa John's. :) Sohom (talk) 14:12, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Approved on that basis. UndercoverClassicist T·C 15:16, 22 November 2023 (UTC)