Template:Did you know nominations/History of East Texas Normal College

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

History of East Texas Normal College edit

ETNC's original campus, 1890
ETNC's original campus, 1890
  • ... that between 1889 and 1917, East Texas Normal College (pictured) educated more public school teachers than any other college or university in Texas?

Moved to mainspace by Michael Barera (talk). Self-nominated at 05:45, 24 June 2016 (UTC).

  • No issues found, ready for human review.
    • This article is new and was created on 05:25, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 11207 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • The probability of copyright violation is 14.5%. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • The media File:Original Cooper Campus (ETNC).jpg is free-use
  • The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 152 characters
  • The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 160 characters
  • The hook ALT2 is an appropriate length at 111 characters
  • This is Michael Barera's 44th nomination. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Vernon Johnson (American football) was performed for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 17:28, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

  • - Michael Barera So double checking the bot, not that I don't trust it ;-) I agree that it's long enough, nominated in time, sourced appropriately both in general and the hook. QPQ done, no copyright issues, no other issues detected. Good to go.  MPJ-DK  01:31, 28 June 2016 (UTC)