- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:44, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Henry Liebman edit
- ... that Henry Liebman hates "Henry Liebman's Noodle Soup"?
Created by Chetsford (talk). Self-nominated at 11:42, 20 January 2018 (UTC).
- COMMENT: The article has wording "However, Liebman himself has said he hates the soup." but in the reference for that statement "hates" is in quotes, and Liebman gives as his reason that the soup “...has too many noodles, it’s not spicy enough and it needs more pickled cabbage.” So, he does not hate the soup, he 'hates' the soup. The article should be revised, and the proposed hook, too. David notMD (talk) 21:42, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, I guess I'm not understanding the difference between hating the soup and "hating" the soup. The quotation marks in the article aren't used as irony punctuation but to indicate a direct quote. Chetsford (talk) 18:18, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
- I read it (the text in the reference) exactly as irony punctuation. Given my opinion, I will defer reviewing this DYK. David notMD (talk) 23:48, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, I guess I'm not understanding the difference between hating the soup and "hating" the soup. The quotation marks in the article aren't used as irony punctuation but to indicate a direct quote. Chetsford (talk) 18:18, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
- COMMENT: IMO this article closer to qualifying for AfD than DYK - the article is about a real estate developer developing real estate, and the hook is that he voiced some criticism about a restaurant dish named after him. David notMD (talk) 10:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
- David notMD, if you believe the article is about a non-notable person, then you should put it up for AfD, as that is the established method for determining whether an article meets notability standards. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:11, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Article is currently at AFD for notability concerns. Until that closes this should be marked as a possible no-go. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 14:04, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
- Agree with Coffee. It would be best to hold this pending resolution of the AfD so as not to create havoc in the event of deletion. Chetsford (talk) 22:06, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
- Per WP:DYKSG#D5:
Articles nominated for deletion must go on hold until they have survived the deletion process.
So it stays on hold until the AfD closes, at which point either the review continues or the nomination is closed. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:08, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
- Per WP:DYKSG#D5:
- The consensus at AfD was Keep which means, I believe, a review can now occur. Chetsford (talk) 05:15, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
Long enough and new enough. The sources check out. The only one I had a problem with was the "Corporations and Charities Filing System", but it looks like they don't have permalinks to business pages (I was able to find the page using a search). No copyvio problems detected. The hook is short enough and I think it is interesting. QPQ done. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:42, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- Agree with Coffee. It would be best to hold this pending resolution of the AfD so as not to create havoc in the event of deletion. Chetsford (talk) 22:06, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
