Template:Did you know nominations/Hazeltine 2000

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:23, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Hazeltine 2000

5x expanded by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self-nominated at 13:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC).

Reviewed INTERFET logistics

  • Article within policy, hook good and interesting, and QPQ done. IceWelder [] 16:17, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Maury Markowitz: Coming to promote this, I see that the source states "The Hazeltine 2000 video terminal, circa 1972, possibly the first popular general-purpose video terminal". If the source uses "possibly the first", neither the article nor the hook should state that it was the first. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:14, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Fixed Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:04, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Thank you both. Replacing tick based on IceWelder's review. Alt1 is better than ALT0. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:37, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I was reviewing this hook and I don't think the above point has been addressed yet. The source says "The Hazeltine 2000 video terminal, circa 1972, possibly the first popular general-purpose video terminal", whereas the hook says it "is thought to be" the first. The source doesn't say anything about thinking it's the first, only that it might be. Also, the source does not use the term "smart terminal" so unless there is a source describing it as that, I don't think that's the wording we should be using. Thanks. Pinging: @Evrik: @Maury Markowitz: @Cwmhiraeth:  — Amakuru (talk) 10:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)