The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 11:34, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Hanpu edit

  • Comment: This is my first DYK nomination. Looking forward to it, and hoping I didn't do anything wrong!

Improved to Good Article status by Madalibi (talk). Self nominated at 06:24, 3 March 2014 (UTC).

  • Recent GA so the quality and sources are good. Hook is cited to an offline source. You may want to remove "wild" from the hook; I can't find and mention of that specific wording. --Jakob (talk) 14:54, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the quick review, Jakec. My bad for not having the right word in the article, sorry about that. I added it in with a link to Google Books. I you want me to find other links to support the hook, let me know and I'll find them too. I also uncapitalized "wild" in the hook because my source doesn't capitalize it. Best, Madalibi (talk) 05:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Gtg. --Jakob (talk) 22:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Great, thanks a lot! Madalibi (talk) 23:48, 4 March 2014 (UTC)