Template:Did you know nominations/HMS Telemachus (P321)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 21:54, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

HMS Telemachus (P321)

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that on 3 June 1956, British submarine Telemachus (pictured) went missing while undertaking a hydrographic survey off the Australian Antarctic Territory?

• Reviewed: Ifa Isfansyah

Created/expanded by Miyagawa (talk). Self nom at 14:31, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

• The article size and timing check out, the photo is appropriate and PD-expired, and there are no apparent CP/copyvio concerns, with offline references taken AGF. There are two concerns though. The first is that in the references, some of them are credited to The Times without further accreditiation. I assume this is the newspaper in Victoria; if so (or otherwise!) that needs to be added to the reference with the location= tag. Secondly, the hook is, while accurate, slightly misleading; a reader would easily be forgiven that "went missing" means "lost at sea (for good)". I would suggest the following alternative hook perhaps? - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:53, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
• ALT1: ... that in June 1956, the British submarine HMS Telemachus (pictured) briefly went missing during a hydrographic survey off the coast of the Australian Antarctic Territory?

Thanks for the review, I've struck through the original hook as yours is actually what I meant! As for The Times - it means literally the British original, not a local Australian paper. Miyagawa (talk) 13:40, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Only just realised that I hadn't actually added those locations to the article! Now completed as requested. Miyagawa (talk) 13:40, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Eep, sorry I overlooked your reply earlier. Looks good to go to me - nice work. :) - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:46, 6 February 2012 (UTC)