Template:Did you know nominations/GrubHub Food Delivery & Pickup

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:17, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

GrubHub Food Delivery & Pickup edit

( Back to T:TDYKArticle history )

  • ... that GrubHub Food Delivery & Pickup is a web and mobile company that lets users find delivery and takeout restaurants near them and order online for free?
  • Comment: Reviewed the article through AfC

Created/expanded by 209.41.117.185 (talk). Nominated by Nathan2055 (talk) at 17:25, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

  • References need to be cleaned up; at DYK we usually avoid promoting articles which use bare URLs as references. Could somebody please clean up the references using a clear format (not bare URLs) and filling in missing bibliographic information? rʨanaɢ (talk) 17:33, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Do you mean that I should replace them with {{cite web}}? --Nathan2055talk - review 19:18, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
It's not mandatory that you use those templates, but you (or someone, it doesn't have to be you) should at least update them to use a clear citation style. What's most important is that bibliographic information is there (author, date, title; it looks like these have titles and in some cases publication names, but they should have more information so it's easier to find the sources when the URLs change or go dead) and that they aren't showing up as bare URLs. rʨanaɢ (talk) 21:27, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Some rephrasing needed, sorry. Am about to log off for a while so might do this in several hours' time if someone doesn't beat me to it. Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:25, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
  • I took care of the legal section. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:21, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Better? Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:35, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
yeah...again, not earth-shattering but a definite improvement. Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:41, 2 September 2011 (UTC)