Template:Did you know nominations/Grevillea shiressii

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:59, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Grevillea shiressii edit

Grevillea shiressii flowers and leaves

5x expanded by Casliber (talk). Self nom at 01:45, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Length (>5x), date verified. All paragraphs have refs; all refs are RS. No apparent paraphrasing issues. QPQ done. Interesting hook; hook length is fine. One thing not done: couldn't verify hook as the only sentence mentioning Hawkesbury lacks an inline citation, and there's no mention of Sydney within the article. --Rosiestep (talk) 04:08, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Oops, forgot to add official gov't ref - added now (and has Sydney bit in it...) Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Reviewer needed now that issue has been addressed. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:08, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Reference added is reliable and supports hook. AutomaticStrikeout (TC) 00:28, 27 January 2013 (UTC)