The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:03, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Gooba

Created by Lk95 (talk) and AshMusique (talk). Nominated by Nice4What (talk) at 23:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC).

  • All of the criteria are met aside from a QPQ, which is required before the hook can be passed. Thatoneweirdwikier | Say hi 16:58, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Everything has been satisfied. I personally prefer the original to ALT1. Nice work! Thatoneweirdwikier | Say hi 03:51, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
  • The review has to list out that each criteria is met. The easiest way is to just use the template in the edit "Reviewer's template for easy copy+paste" box when you're editing this page. @Thatoneweirdwikier: can you please do that? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:19, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - In the article, it is thoroughly cited, which is fine. Ignore the 'x'.
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Good to go. Thatoneweirdwikier | Say hi 06:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for redoing this review. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ) 19:57, 30 May 2020 (UTC)