Template:Did you know nominations/Evangelienmotetten

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 22:23, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Repromoting now that satisfactory review has been done and documented.

Evangelienmotetten edit

(

)

... that Evangelienmotetten were settings to music of verses from the New Testament?

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Imademo

Created by Prioryman (talk). Self-nominated at 12:44, 16 September 2015 (UTC).

No issues here. Good to go, though the hook is brief. Ceoil (talk) 18:48, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

@Ceoil: Could you please list what DYK criteria you checked on this? As a courtesy to the nominator, we'd like to make sure all points have been examined, so the hook doesn't later get pulled because of an incomplete review. Thanks for your cooperation. — Maile (talk) 23:43, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Rechecked on Ceoil's behalf. All checks out. Good to go. LavaBaron (talk) 08:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Review by Maile

QPQ done by Prioryman September 11, 2015

Eligibility

Article created by Prioryman on September 16, 2015 and contains 3442 characters (0 words) "readable prose size"
Article is NPOV, currently stable, no edit wars, no dispute tags

Hook, Sourcing and copyvio check

Every paragraph sourced
No bare URLs, and no external links used as inline sources
Earwig's copyvio detector show no issues of concern: 0 % chance of copyvio violation
Hook is fine at 79 characters, NPOV, sourced and stated in the article.

Image

No image in either the hook or the article.

@BlueMoonset: and @Prioryman: I have temporarily reverted the close on this template in order to insert a correct review, so as to lessen the possibility of any later questions that this nomination was actually reviewed. What exists above my review does not meet DYK criteria for a review. BlueMoonset, could you please close this nomination and move this hook from where it's holding, to on up to an available slot. Prioryman, I'm sorry your nomination got caught up in this, but better to be safe than sorry.— Maile (talk) 20:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)