Template:Did you know nominations/Elevational Diversity Gradient

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:07, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Elevational Diversity Gradient edit

Created/expanded by Mike.stansel (talk), Ratkins92 (talk). Nominated by Mike.stansel (talk) at 20:06, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

  • Article is big and new enough. However there are sections with no references. The introduction, first paragraph in Origin and Area Hypothesis have no references. Normally the introduction would need no reference as the content would be covered elsewhere in the article with a citation. In this case the hook is included but not expanded on elsewhere, so I will have to count hook as uncited. Also the hook is quite boring being just a definition. An alternative is the idea about the Flood concentrating species higher up is much more interesting. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:02, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Issues still present. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:26, 20 December 2012 (UTC)