Template:Did you know nominations/Edmonds station (Washington)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:25, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Edmonds station (Washington) edit
... that Amtrak cancelled passenger train service to Edmonds station in 1971, only to return a year later? Source: "Amtrak will restore service to B.C.". The Seattle Times. June 30, 1972. p. A14.
- ALT1:... that the former baggage room of Edmonds station is now used by a model railroad club? The Seattle Times
- ALT2:... that Amtrak threatened to have trains skip Edmonds station after the city failed to approve permits for new fences? Source: Schaefer, David; Wurzer, Wayne (May 9, 1995). "Amtrak run might bypass Edmonds". The Seattle Times. p. B1.
- Reviewed: Iqro
5x expanded by SounderBruce (talk). Self-nominated at 04:52, 23 March 2018 (UTC).
- new enough; more than long enough; QPQ done; no copyvio or close paraphrasing found; hooks are all neutral; article is policy compliant; uses inline cites; all hooks are cited inline to sources not online, accepted under AGF, titles support hooks, sources are plausible; all hooks short enough; I think alt1 is most interesting. Looks good to me. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 22:57, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
- ALT2 "failed to approve" more accurately summarizes the article than "withheld". DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 22:57, 22 April 2018 (UTC)