Template:Did you know nominations/Devin Futrell

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 04:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Devin Futrell

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Devin Futrell used a post to dodge a draft? Source: https://www.tennessean.com/story/sports/college/vanderbilt/2022/06/02/how-devin-futrells-rise-vanderbilt-baseball-began-backyard-ace/9766018002
  • Reviewed: (Third nomination - none needed)
  • Comment: This refers to Futrell's use of a Twitter post to pull himself out of (i.e. dodge) the MLB draft. I mean no disrespect whatsover with this April Fools' nomination. Thank you.

Moved to mainspace by NotReallySoroka (talk). Self-nominated at 20:25, 4 February 2023 (UTC). Note: As of October 2022, all changes made to promoted hooks will be logged by a bot. The log for this nomination can be found at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Devin Futrell, so please watch a successfully closed nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• I'll review this one! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 02:03, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing:
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
• Other problems: - Violates rule D6 due to the dispute tag.

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @NotReallySoroka: As clever as this hook is, I'm afraid that the dispute tag needs to be addressed before it can be promoted. Don't worry, you got two months until April Fools! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 02:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

• The article has been deleted for lack of notability. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 21:18, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
• No, the article had not been deleted; it had been moved to draft space. It's now back in main space and I've thus reopened the nomination. Schwede66 05:24, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Would make a good quirky hook. Nice job on getting it back into the mainspace! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 11:20, 12 April 2023 (UTC)