Template:Did you know nominations/Curtis Comes Home
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:01, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Curtis Comes Home edit
- ... that professional wrestling referee Mark Curtis made an unannounced appearance at Curtis Comes Home, his own benefit show?
- Reviewed: n/a - not a self-nomination
Moved to mainspace by 72.74.205.152 (talk). Nominated by GaryColemanFan (talk) at 15:03, 12 July 2015 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, neutral, no copyvios issues, verifiable. Reference #6 doesn't seem like a reliable source to me, and I believe its use in the article could be easily duplicated by a different reference; mind checking if another of the references you already have there could cover the fact it's used to cite? Hook is cited and interesting. You have more than 5 DYK credits, so you are not subject to the QPQ exemption. I haven't been able to find any exemption to QPQ for nominations of other editors in the rules or supplementary rules, so one is still needed unless you can point me towards a rule that says otherwise.It's in the reviewing guide, nevermind. QPQ done, just waiting on the RS issue. ~ RobTalk 00:34, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- I added another reference to the match result that was only covered by the Shark Boy reference. I haven't removed the reference at this point, as it seems to fall within the guidelines for WP:SPS, as Shark Boy is an industry insider and the claim doesn't seem self-serving or controversial. Would you want it removed altogether? GaryColemanFan (talk) 02:19, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- @GaryColemanFan: If a self-published source can be replaced by a secondary source of equal or greater value, it's generally advisable to do so. I won't hold up the review over it, though, as that goes beyond a DYK review. Originally, I had thought it was a fan site, not an official site. That leaves the QPQ. I double-checked on whether QPQs are required for non-self-noms, and apparently there was a somewhat recent change that requires them for all nominations. See here. This is good to go after a QPQ is completed. ~ RobTalk 02:47, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- QPQ complete: Template:Did you know nominations/AAA When Worlds Collide. Thank you for informing me about the rule change. GaryColemanFan (talk) 04:59, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
