Template:Did you know nominations/Bristol Naturalists' Society

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 23:46, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Bristol Naturalists' Society edit

Created/expanded by ACP2011 (talk). Self nom at 13:54, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Nice work, thank you. Hook, length, etc all check out. Well-written also. ACP, I hope you don't mind, but I trimmed Libby Houston from the article: her award doesn't seem directly related to the organization. Drmies (talk) 18:20, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Thank you. If you feel strongly about deleting her, O.K. It's just that page 6 of the pdf for Bristol Naturalist News (July-August 2012, reference #1) was mostly about Libby. The organization seemed very proud of the award that she had received. (I wasn't able to retrieve a URL for the pdf, but if you're interested, go to reference 3, click on "Events," and click on last pdf-August 2012.) Thanks again. Anne (talk) 03:49, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
  • I tend to agree with removing Libby Houston. She is but one member of the organization, and probably all of them have achieved one or more awards in their career. However, Anne, Libby herself would be worthy of an article on her own. If you do a search on Wikipedia, Libby Houston is also listed in other articles. I found this link: University of Bristol news Maile66 (talk) 13:10, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Good to go. Good job, Anne.
  • NPOV article on British natural history organization
  • QPQ done by ACP2011 on August 5, 2012
  • Article created on July 27, 2012 by ACP2011 and has 3,741 characters of readable prose
  • Hook is interesting, short enough at 100 characters, and sourced at the end of the sentence
  • Duplication Detector run, no copyvio found
  • Every paragraph sourced
  • Time spent on this review, 40 minutes
Maile66 (talk) 13:10, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your review! (And I probably will go ahead and write an article on Libby.) Anne (talk) 15:40, 19 August 2012 (UTC)