- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 04:24, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Bork tapes
Created by GuardianH (talk). Self-nominated at 21:09, 6 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Bork tapes; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall:
@GuardianH: Looks good—I made a few edits to the article, but nothing that substantially affects its suitability for DYK. Created
September 5; readable prose size is currently 4097 characters (669 words); scrupulously sourced and reasonably neutral; no apparent copyright violations, with Earwig's Detector only picking up properly cited quotations and incidental shards of text like book titles and names of statutes; no QPQ is required (although this should be the author's fifth DYK, so going forward that'll be required); hook itself is cited and sufficiently interesting. Good work! A weird little moment, indeed.
—blz 2049 ➠ ❏ 01:46, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
@GuardianH: Looks good—I made a few edits to the article, but nothing that substantially affects its suitability for DYK. Created September 5; readable prose size is currently 4097 characters (669 words); scrupulously sourced and reasonably neutral; no apparent copyright violations, with Earwig's Detector only picking up properly cited quotations and incidental shards of text like book titles and names of statutes; no QPQ is required (although this should be the author's fifth DYK, so going forward that'll be required); hook itself is cited and sufficiently interesting. Good work! A weird little moment, indeed. —blz 2049 ➠ ❏ 01:46, 7 September 2023 (UTC)