- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:38, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Black stork edit
Black stork
- ... that the black stork (pictured) population has declined for many years in western Europe, and the species has already been extirpated from Scandinavia? Source: "It has already been extirpated from Scandinavia..."Storks, Ibises and Spoonbills of the World (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
Improved to Good Article status by Adityavagarwal (talk). Self-nominated at 08:55, 12 July 2017 (UTC).
Detailed article, on plenty of good sources, offline sources accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. I think the image with the "portrait" might work better in small size. Both are licensed. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:23, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- Certainly looks better. Replaced it with the image you mentioned.
Adityavagarwal (talk) 19:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- Certainly looks better. Replaced it with the image you mentioned.
- shouldn't it be "black stork" rather than "Black stork" per the sentence case of the article title and the opening sentence? — Amakuru (talk) 20:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- Woops! Thanks a big bunch for the fix. Adityavagarwal (talk) 01:27, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
- Woops! Thanks a big bunch for the fix.
- shouldn't it be "black stork" rather than "Black stork" per the sentence case of the article title and the opening sentence? — Amakuru (talk) 20:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)