Template:Did you know nominations/Birgit Dahlenburg

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Valereee (talk) 15:37, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Birgit Dahlenburg

Croy Tapestry
Croy Tapestry
  • ... that the art historian Birgit Dahlenburg was instrumental in the recognition of the Croy Carpet (pictured) from the 16th century as a national heritage? Source: [1]
  • Reviewed: Rosalie Carey
  • Comment: Article spent a few days in Main space in 2019, then a year+ in draft, now a few days back in Mainspace.

Moved to mainspace by LouisAlain (talk) and Gerda Arendt (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 14:28, 31 May 2021 (UTC).

  • Comment For heaven's sake Gerda, this is a tapestry (for a wall) NOT a carpet (for a floor). And please translate the caption. Also " a national heritage" is not idiomatic English. Johnbod (talk) 16:15, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
    Thank you for teaching, but had it to be heaven? I can use the English phrase for the caption instead of the original Croy-Teppich, but thought it adds little. Sorry, I often don't know what's idiomatic English. My translator suggests for Kulturgut: cultural heritage, cultural property, cultural asset. I thought that "cultural" was redundant in this case as long as you see it.
    I would have thought the German word was "tapestrie". Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:34, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
    The German word seems to be de:Tapisserie but it's technical/scientific. The words people actually use are Bildteppich and (perhaps more often) Wandteppich. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:47, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
    ALT0a: ... that the art historian Birgit Dahlenburg was instrumental in the recognition of the Croy Tapestry (pictured) from the 16th century as a cultural asset of national value? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:06, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Dates of birth and death are in the lead and the infobox but not the body and are not referenced. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:28, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Hawkeye7, thank you for the review, and especially for adding the image!! I moved the ref from before the brackets to after. Several other refs have the day of death, but only the year of birth. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:40, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Good to go. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 09:42, 17 June 2021 (UTC)