Template:Did you know nominations/Biochronology

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 06:51, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Biochronology edit

  • ... that biochronology that is not tied to stratigraphic sections is not recognized by the International Stratigraphic Guide?

5x expanded by RockMagnetist (talk). Self-nominated at 18:45, 31 August 2015 (UTC).

  • Long enough. Expansion is new enough. Hook is cited. AGF for the offline sources. I choose ALT1 since its more readily understandable. Good to go! Étienne Dolet (talk) 20:11, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
  • @EtienneDolet: Thank you. For me, all the sources were available online. You should be able to access them using the ISBN and DOI links. RockMagnetist(talk) 20:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)