The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 11:35, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Baleč edit

Created/expanded by Antidiskriminator (talk). Self nom at 00:07, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

  • Everything appears to check out, although I have to AGF on the sources. Only the last two sources for the entire article seem questionable in their reliability. Otherwise, the article is a bit difficult to follow for anyone not already knowledgeable about the topic. In general, though, it meets the basic requirements. – VisionHolder « talk » 18:16, 5 February 2012 (UTC)