Template:Did you know nominations/Anthony Musgrave (entomologist)

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Anthony Musgrave (entomologist)'s DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:50, 22 April 2013 (UTC).

Anthony Musgrave (entomologist)

edit

Created by Bonkers The Clown (talk). Self nominated at 08:01, 21 April 2013 (UTC).

  • That's a funny hook and also very apt. I was a bit worried about the required minimum length but turned out the article is just a few characters longer than 1,500. If you could only add an additional citation to the Australian Dictionary of Biography to the sentence that introduces Musgrave as the nephey of Anthony Musgrave, then I'd be even more happy. Reading the current reference for the hook requires a subscribtion to a certain journal, so why not use the freely available source that is equally reliable? De728631 (talk) 14:26, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. Now, the Journal of the Society for the Bibliography of Natural History source was definitely published first... And then the ADB got information from that source, thus making the ADB seem like a middleman. The Journal... source also appears more authoritative and slightly more reliable, which is why I naturally used that, instead of the ADB source, which I cited only for points of information not covered by the Journal... source. Nonetheless, I respectfully did what you requested for citing Musgrave as the great nephew of Musgrave with the ADB source. Cheers, ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 14:57, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Excellent. I'd say it's ready to go. De728631 (talk) 19:35, 21 April 2013 (UTC)