- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by HaEr48 (talk) 03:49, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Ahmed Jahouh
edit
5x expanded by Royroydeb (talk). Self-nominated at 06:23, 2 May 2018 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Article is new enough and the prose has been expanded 5x from the original, which just pushes it over the 1500 character minimum. Article is sourced and neutral and there is no evidence of plagiarism. The hook is interesting, of an appropriate length, and cited in the body of the article. There's no picture to review and the QPQ has been done, so this one should be good to go. Canadian Paul 09:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC) Canadian Paul 09:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
The hook is interesting and cited, but perhaps this could work as a better hook?
- ALT1: ... that Ahmed Jahouh, the first Moroccan footballer to play in India, did not sport the logo of a sponsor on his jersey due to his religious beliefs?
- Thoughts @Royroydeb and Canadian Paul:? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:58, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- The proposed alternative hook is too wordy, in my opinion. Suggest sticking with the original hook, simple and easy. HaEr48 (talk) 08:05, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, agree with HaEr48. RRD (talk) 12:06, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Article is new enough and the prose has been expanded 5x from the original, which just pushes it over the 1500 character minimum. Article is sourced and neutral and there is no evidence of plagiarism. The hook is interesting, of an appropriate length, and cited in the body of the article. There's no picture to review and the QPQ has been done, so this one should be good to go. Canadian Paul 09:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC) Canadian Paul 09:05, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
