Template:Did you know nominations/ASV Mark III radar

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:27, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

ASV Mark III radar edit

ASV Mark III under the nose of a RAAF Wellington
ASV Mark III under the nose of a RAAF Wellington
  • ... that the ASV Mark III radar was able to hunt down German U-boats with deadly efficiency in part because of a little white lie? (Lovell p 191, most other refs used also have this story)

Created by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self-nominated at 16:50, 15 April 2019 (UTC).

  • @Maury Markowitz: New article, plenty long enough(!), well-referenced and within policy. There are two issues: a QPQ is needed, and I think a revised hook that explains "a little white lie" would be better/more self-contained than the current hook. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 08:08, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Reviewed Island of stability. @Mike Peel: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maury Markowitz (talkcontribs)

@Maury Markowitz: Thanks for doing the QPQ. I think there's just the hook issue remaining: that it would be better to explain what "little white lie" was rather than using that phrasing (or convince me otherwise!). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:34, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
@Mike Peel: sorry just saw this - after ~500 of these things, a little mystery in the hook sells. Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:19, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
@Maury Markowitz: That's true, but in this case won't it make people think of carrots? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:38, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
Sure, that's the general idea! Maury Markowitz (talk) 11:53, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
OK, fair enough. I'm going to mark this as ready, as long as the posting admin's also happy with this approach. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 12:49, 30 April 2019 (UTC)