Template:Did you know nominations/Šupelka

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Victuallers (talk) 11:01, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Šupelka edit

Created by Phill24th (talk). Nominated by Phill24th (talk) at 17:09, 3 March 2014 (UTC).

  • Review complete.
  • New: Created on 03 March & nominated on 03 March by creator.
  • Long enough - 1537 chars (243 words) using DYKCheck.
  • Adequately referenced in each paragraph. AGF for Macdonian sources.
  • No plagiarism/copyvios as regards English sources. AGF for Macedonian sources which logically should not contribute to copy vio.
  • Hook adequate length & as per format. Key hook fact referenced but AGF due to Macedonian language.
  • No image.

AshLin (talk) 15:30, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Pulled out of Queue 2 because the hook fact doesn't make sense. We need a more idiomatic translation, or a different hook fact. --Orlady (talk) 19:06, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Adding icon indicating a problem to prevent this from being repromoted before the hook issue is dealt with. (You can't improvise traditional melodies; traditional melodies have been around for a long time.) BlueMoonset (talk) 19:20, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment: Yeah...I think you must have misunderstood, I will try to fix it as soon as possible on the article... My point was, that the shupelka is used as a background instrument improvising the traditional elements of other instruments not present in the musical performances... My bad, fixing it immediately on the article's text...Phill24th (talk) 19:40, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Done, fixed the article's (well, kind of) incomprehensible text.Phill24th (talk) 19:46, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
  • You'll need to supply a new (ALT) hook as well; the old one can't be used given its problematic phrasing. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:50, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
I've restored the original hook above (so the discussion will make sense). Below is Phill24th's ALT hook, slightly edited by me:
I'll AGF on the hook fact (which is credible, based on what I was able to read in English sources), so this is good to go now. --Orlady (talk) 20:33, 12 March 2014 (UTC)