Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal/testcases

Regular

Regular

{{Arbitration enforcement appeal |Appealing user=Tamzin}}

{{Arbitration enforcement appeal}}

Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Tamzin

Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found here. According to the procedures, a "clear and substantial consensus of uninvolved administrators" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action.

To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see WP:UNINVOLVED).

Appealing user

Tamzin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – ~~~~

Sanction being appealed

{{{Sanction being appealed}}}

Administrator imposing the sanction

Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

Notification of that administrator

The appealing editor is asked to notify the administrator who made the enforcement action of this appeal, and then to replace this text with a diff of that notification. The appeal may not be processed otherwise. If a block is appealed, the editor moving the appeal to this board should make the notification.

Statement by Tamzin

{{{Reason for the appeal}}}

Statement by {{{User imposing the sanction}}}

Statement by (involved editor 1)

Statement by (involved editor 2)

Discussion among uninvolved editors about the appeal by Tamzin

Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator.
Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.

Statement by (uninvolved editor 1)

Statement by (uninvolved editor 2)

Result of the appeal by Tamzin

This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.

{{Arbitration enforcement appeal/sandbox}}

Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Tamzin

Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found here. According to the procedures, a "clear and substantial consensus of uninvolved administrators" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action.

To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see WP:UNINVOLVED).

Appealing user

Tamzin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – ~~~~

Sanction being appealed

{{{Sanction being appealed}}}

Administrator imposing the sanction

Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

Notification of that administrator

The appealing editor is asked to notify the administrator who made the enforcement action of this appeal, and then to replace this text with a diff of that notification. The appeal may not be processed otherwise. If a block is appealed, the editor moving the appeal to this board should make the notification.

Statement by Tamzin

{{{Reason for the appeal}}}

Statement by {{{User imposing the sanction}}}

Statement by (involved editor 1)

Statement by (involved editor 2)

Discussion among uninvolved editors about the appeal by Tamzin

Statements must be made in separate sections. They may not exceed 500 words and 20 diffs, except by permission of a reviewing administrator.
Administrators may remove or shorten noncompliant statements. Disruptive contributions may result in blocks.

Statement by (uninvolved editor 1)

Statement by (uninvolved editor 2)

Result of the appeal by Tamzin

This section is to be edited only by uninvolved administrators. Comments by others will be moved to the sections above.

AN

AN

{{Arbitration enforcement appeal |Appealing user=Tamzin |demopage=Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard}}

{{Arbitration enforcement appeal}}

Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Tamzin

Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found here. According to the procedures, a "clear and substantial consensus of uninvolved editors" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action.

To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections. Other editors may comment below. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see WP:UNINVOLVED).

Appealing user

Tamzin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – ~~~~

Sanction being appealed

{{{Sanction being appealed}}}

Administrator imposing the sanction

Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

Notification of that administrator

The appealing editor is asked to notify the administrator who made the enforcement action of this appeal, and then to replace this text with a diff of that notification. The appeal may not be processed otherwise. If a block is appealed, the editor moving the appeal to this board should make the notification.

Statement by Tamzin

{{{Reason for the appeal}}}

Statement by {{{User imposing the sanction}}}

Statement by (involved editor 1)

Statement by (involved editor 2)

Discussion among uninvolved editors about the appeal by Tamzin

{{Arbitration enforcement appeal/sandbox}}

Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Tamzin

Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found here. According to the procedures, a "clear and substantial consensus of uninvolved editors" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action.

To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections. Other editors may comment below. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see WP:UNINVOLVED).

Appealing user

Tamzin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – ~~~~

Sanction being appealed

{{{Sanction being appealed}}}

Administrator imposing the sanction

Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

Notification of that administrator

The appealing editor is asked to notify the administrator who made the enforcement action of this appeal, and then to replace this text with a diff of that notification. The appeal may not be processed otherwise. If a block is appealed, the editor moving the appeal to this board should make the notification.

Statement by Tamzin

{{{Reason for the appeal}}}

Statement by {{{User imposing the sanction}}}

Statement by (involved editor 1)

Statement by (involved editor 2)

Discussion among uninvolved editors about the appeal by Tamzin